More often than not the assessments used to measure the academic achievement of schools (firstly) and students (secondarily) measure students receptive competencies through multiple-choice questions/extremely short responses. When these assessments measure a students productive competencies through extended response, their marking rubrics privilege content at the expense of structure, crafting and text features.
Being standardized, these assessments are cheap to develop, administer, and score.
Let’s assume that this model embraces and prioritises the wellbeing of students and teachers. Let’s further assume that teachers teach five classes and that each of the classes consists of 30 students and meets five times a week for 60 minutes. Continue reading Multiple Choice: A) Funding B) Ranking C) Economy D) Time E) All of the above at the expense of teaching and learning →